Vincent Bugliosi's Reclaiming History is the most audacious defense of the Warren Commission in years. Can it be trusted?

 

We have a series of opinions and analyses below.

Vincent Bugliosi

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark Lane

This longtime assassination critic answers Vincent Bugliosi in an article called "Vinnie, It is Round."

 

 

Dr. Gary Aguilar

Dr. Aguilar, a member of the Board of Directors of the Assassination Archives and Research Center, says Bugliosi is a boxer who hasn't laid a glove on the case for conspiracy.

 

 

Josiah Thompson

Thompson says many historical events draw wacky theories, but that writing a 1,660-page book is not the proper response. This review originally appeared in The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

 

 

 

The Times' Cheap Shot

David Talbot, Anthony Summers, Jefferson Morley, and even Norman Mailer co-signed a letter to The New York Times objecting to unprovoked remarks included in a review of Bugliosi's book.

 

 

Point-Counterpoint

Bugliosi and Talbot squared off in Time magazine. Also in that magazine, Talbot offered a long essay on JFK. CTKA's James DiEugenio found it all extraordinary.

 

 

Twenty Years of Work

William Davy traces Bugliosi's two decades-long research odyssey.

 

 

Besmirching History

Michael Green argues that Bugliosi's real objective is to conceal the true nature of the JFK assassination.

 

Black Op Radio

Dr. David Mantik discussed Bugliosi's book with Black Op's Len Osanic.

 

Big Book, Small Screen

Reclaiming History appears headed for the small screen. See articles by John Kelin and from Variety.

 

If you notice any problems with any of these links, please let us know! Use the "Contact Us" option up top.